Eric Quigley vs Mao-Xin Gong Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L W L W L L
Form
L L L L L L W L W LHead-To-Head: Quigley 1 - 0 Gong
They have played 3 sets in total, with Quigley winning 2 and Gong winning 1. The last match between Quigley and Gong was at the San Francisco Challenger, 06-02-2017, Q3, I.hard with Eric Quigley getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-7(5) 7-6(4).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Eric Quigley | 1 |
| Mao-Xin Gong | 0 |
San Francisco Challenger(06-02-2017)
7
6
6
7
7
6
| Quigley | Stats | Gong |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 297 | Highest Rank | 294 |
| 36 | Age | 37 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 5 |
| 54% (197-171) | Career Total W/L | 55% (212-173) |
| $9,365 | Career Prize Money | $520 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Medvedev VS Cerundolo PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-7(5) 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Eric Quigley
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
55%
(
71 of
130)
1st Serve %
54%
(
85 of
158)
19
Aces
10
7
Double Faults
6
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
57 of
85)
46%
(
27 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
48 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
67 of
158)
149
Total Points Won
139
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 20 | Games Won | 19 |
| 19 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:48:49 | Average Match Time | 2:48:49 |
| 55% (71/130) | 1st Serve % | 54% (85/158) |
| 77% (55/71) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (57/85) |
| 46% (27/59) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (34/73) |
| 25% (4/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (4/8) |
| 42% (67/158) | Return Points Win % | 37% (48/130) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (2/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Eric Quigley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Eric Quigley
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
5
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Harrison
Player
Eric Quigley
69%
(
83 of
121)
1st Serve %
54%
(
54 of
100)
10
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
40%
(
48 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
114
Total Points Won
107
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eric Quigley
Player
John Lamble
67%
(
66 of
98)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
115)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
27 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
41 of
115)
112
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christopher Eubanks
Player
Eric Quigley
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
12
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eric Quigley
Player
Dominik Koepfer
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrew Harris
Player
Eric Quigley
79%
(
67 of
85)
1st Serve %
50%
(
59 of
118)
5
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
10
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
25 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
48 of
118)
108
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eric Quigley
Player
Keegan Smith
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
Player
Eric Quigley
60%
(
61 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
5
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
2
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
94)
107
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Brayden Schnur
Player
Eric Quigley
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Mao-Xin Gong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mao-Xin Gong
Player
Min-Kyu Song
60%
(
67 of
112)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
103)
10
Aces
10
11
Double Faults
6
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
34%
(
38 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
103)
111
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 7-6(9) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lukas Ollert
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mao-Xin Gong
Player
Worarin Kumthonkittikul
55%
(
47 of
85)
1st Serve %
38%
(
33 of
88)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
11
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
97
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sidharth Rawat
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
61%
(
80 of
132)
1st Serve %
49%
(
42 of
85)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
42%
(
22 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
44%
(
58 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
112
Total Points Won
105
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
41%
(
25 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hans Podlipnik-Castillo
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
89%
(
16 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Mies
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
40%
(
19 of
48)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eric Quigley
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
55%
(
71 of
130)
1st Serve %
54%
(
85 of
158)
19
Aces
10
7
Double Faults
6
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
57 of
85)
46%
(
27 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
48 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
67 of
158)
149
Total Points Won
139
|
7-6(3) 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (197/171) | Win/Loss | 55% (212/173) |
| 54% (457/397) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (465/419) |
| 51% (4199/3975) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (4209/3968) |
| 56% (120/96) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (185/140) |
| 49% (25/26) | Clay Win/Loss | 35% (9/17) |
| 53% (51/45) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53% (16/14) |
| 20% (1/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 1080 | Aces Total | 261 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 673 | Total Double Faults | 338 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 650.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 569.43 |
| 56% (7708/13786) | 1st Serve % | 59% (3624/6102) |
| 73% (5646/7708) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (2380/3624) |
| 49% (3010/6082) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1147/2478) |
| 41% (529/1305) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (223/507) |
| 39% (5232/13494) | Return Points Win % | 37% (2232/5958) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (2/2) |
| 40% (8/12) | Main Tour W/L | 13% (1/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (65/67) | Challenger W/L | 49% (59/61) |
| 58% (124/91) | Futures W/L | 61% (150/97) |
| 53% (194/364) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (203/372) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 51% (58/113) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (49/104) |
| 46% (55/120) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (70/116) |
| 81% (208/168) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (199/176) |
| 19% (208/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (199/22) |
| 18% (160/29) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (186/35) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
